Creating health in one’s self is actually a rudimentary undertaking. Maintaining that healthy state for the duration of one’s life is secondary only to what one does with one’s life. The highest aim, of course, is to do some good for the community in which we live. This community includes the home in which we were nurtured, the neighbors which helped us to grow up, the surrounding territory, the country which provided guidance and protection, and ultimately, the entire world. Really, what else is there to do with life? If we seek to do good for our community and the people then we are worthy of the gifts that we have been given. If we seek to do nothing but take from the community, without giving back in some way, then we disrespect our Creator and the community. If we take all the wars, discontent, inhumanity, stupidity, and other moronic behavior, large and small, we can easily see that a great number of people have disrespected our community. This is not, as ignorant people seem to think, inevitable. There is a cure.
Education is the cure
Before the gentle reader assumes that he knows what is educative, let me define “education”. Most people would say that the schooling that they have been given since kindergarten is education. The more schooling, from grammar school to multiple doctoral degrees, the more people think that they are educated. I say, “No, rather they have been brainwashed for the number of years that they have spent sitting at a desk in school”. Education is far more than learning to regurgitate endless, meaningless facts on a standardized test. Education is only obtained in the real world, living day-to-day. Said another way, education is the combination of schooling, where you learn how to read and to count from one to ten, and experience, where you apply the schooling to daily living. Most schooling does not transfer to daily life. There are very few teachers (a misnomer) who understand education since they have been created in the same dry mold, as they will subject their students. Some of our most respected people, Lincoln, for example, had almost no schooling, yet he showed himself to be highly intelligent and experienced in life – he was truly educated. For most folks, having been to college is some sort of merit badge that is proudly worn. The truth is that most people learned nothing more than to drink alcohol, take drugs, play cards, and otherwise to waste their precious time.
Education is mainly experience with a little schooling mixed in. An example of real education: You are walking down the street and a dog jumps out of the bushes and he bites you. You are painfully aware that a bite from a dog hurts; you have learned something useful. As a result, you will avoid the situation in the future. You will alter your route, or learn to run away from the dog, or learn to prevent the dog from biting you by some means while you confront him (he might be your dog). Can you learn these things from a book? Of course not, there is no emotion, no fear, no real life consequences. It is the same with most television shows; there is no real life application, no emotion, no consequences, no need to deal with future events. School is sterile, and people who possess only schooling, become sterile as well.
Applying education
To make a better world for ourselves and for future generations we must educate, not school, our citizens. To help with this education we will need to use some tools. We can teach the little folks to read and write our language so that we can learn to communicate. We need to be able to count from one to ten, anything more than that is superfluous. We need to show people how to wash their hands and to be safe crossing the street, and so on. These simple lessons are the things that ought to be taught in the first four or five years of life before most of us were sent to brainwashing schools. Once these basic tools are shown to the people, then education can begin.
It is important to understand that education comes from the person; it is not crammed into the person. People learn, they are not taught. If you are taught, then you are brainwashed into thinking that the other person knows more than you know and you must accept it. An educated person has been encouraged to seek knowledge and understanding from within by a facilitator. In our present society, we see that most people have been taught what to think and that thinking for oneself is discouraged. Thus we have made a society of cows who simply gather into a herd to await whatever slaughter the controllers desire.
Chess and globe, a better way
Chess and Globe (CG) is a straight forward (as I see it) Socratic educational tool; there is absolutely nothing to match it, especially in this grossly neurotic society. It is facilitator-driven, meaning that it is my idea that the students will learn stuff. The essence of the concept is that the facilitator creates an atmosphere conducive to learning; the students want to learn because the leader shows them the advantages of learning and education in the subjects presented. CG is not an easy gig. What looks very simple to the untrained eye is really a complex, well orchestrated educative venue predicated on the fact that the learners are real people, albeit small, who deserve the concentrated effort of highly intelligent, highly motivated leaders. One cannot "learn" CG because it comes from inside the participants (all of us). Rather, it is "let out" or "brought to the surface".
Though the leader defines very loose parameters, learning is grown in the rich soil of caring for all creatures, without boundaries, so that all involved may explore whatever intelligence that they possess; they all share and they are encouraged to see to it that their co-participants reach and understand that which they have become interested in learning. The emphasis is more on helping the "other guy" to succeed. The Self emerges in concert with its involvement in others. (It is easy to see from this sparse explanation that, taken far enough, CG can cure mankind's despicable nature and it is capable of bringing about world peace.)
At the highest level we would observe only intelligent people discussing philosophical matters of relevance to all concerned. (You can imagine that finding such people is extremely difficult.) So, when we consider starting at the bottom of the scale, meaning that we are working with little folk, we are really training them to advance to the highest level. Of course not all of them will make it, but if we shoot for the moon, we may get our participants much further along than anyone could reasonably expect; although, expectations are a sensitive area in CG, for we dare not cap anyone's learning. We want to encourage everyone to advance at his or her own pace (governed by their intelligence and the facilitator's savvy) with the limit being outer space - mmm, maybe that's not far enough?
CG is a tool of the soul. We can write volumes on how to do it, but in the end, it depends upon the participants themselves and the facilitator's innate ability to reach into the souls of others, to see what is lacking, and to deftly cause the person to affect his fellow participants. Notice that we do not want to "teach" anyone, this happens automatically without the student realizing that he has acquired self-growth. Remember that we are dealing with a complete entity, the whole person, not just his mind or math or mushrooms. For this reason the leader must be fully adept at reading each person so that the most efficacious method will be applied in each case. To become a leader in CG, one must be fully educated in self and one must have a positive, passionate feeling toward others.
How CG came into being
CG was created from my vast ignorance. The only thing that I did right was to care about the little people. At the time, I lived in a neighborhood where education was not a high priority. I was concerned that some of the kids were doing poorly in school and I wanted to bring them up to level with their classmates. The biggest problem was that I knew absolutely nothing about teaching – this, as it turns out, was my biggest asset.
I attempted to tutor these children in the evening during the summer. What I found is that the kids wanted to learn many things, not only school subjects that troubled them, but other, more interesting things about the world at large. Since I was ignorant of any “teaching theories” I simply let the children guide me in where they wanted to go. I was astounded at the intelligence demonstrated by kids in grammar school. Their grades in school were very low, but once I allowed them to present what they thought on their own, the tutorial took on a very different light.
I expected nothing
Since I didn’t know what to expect, I expected nothing; I didn’t place limits on their abilities; I didn’t crush their creativity; I just tried to encourage whatever they thought. Traditional schooling crushes creativity. And, the more schooling one endures, the more creativity is lost. Interestingly, the most creative thinking comes from our youngest citizens; they haven’t, as yet, been thoroughly brainwashed. The more that I encouraged the students to create, the more that they brought out. The nightly sessions were magical. I saw things that I never imagined. For example, all of the kids were eventually able to mentally multiply three digit numbers by three digit numbers with perfect accuracy in a matter of seconds. The secret: I didn’t tell them that it couldn’t be done. And, when one kid secreted in a calculator to try to gain advantage, I told him to openly use it – and that he would not succeed because the human brain is much faster. He tried the calculator, he failed to gain advantage, and he happily went back to using his brain.
The downside
Unfortunately, when I tapped into these children’s abilities, I made the mistake of thinking that their parents and teachers would be proud of their accomplishments. Once more my ignorance taught me something. Once in a while some of the parents would show up at the sessions just to see what their children were doing. They were always invited to participate in the activities. The children, however, didn’t know that their parents, by virtue of the fact that they were older, were supposed to know more about everything. This was not the case; the kids were much better, and faster at figuring out all of the subjects than were their parents. The adults, of course, were embarrassed. This had a deleterious effect upon all concerned. One very damaging event occurred in the classroom when school started again in the fall. The student (who had been retained in the first grade because of poor academic performance) embarrassed his teacher by demonstrating more knowledge of geography than she could. The principal and the teacher and his parents reprimanded him. This pressure by adults (?) on a seven-year-old boy confused the child. He learned from this experience that he was to remain ignorant and dull if he was to be accepted by the people who were his instructors. Is it any wonder that he reverted back to the place that he had come from? He is but one example of millions of people who are the products of our school system, a system that breeds all manner of poor health, criminality, and crushed creativity.
Is there any hope?
Yes, there is hope but it is a long road to travel from where we are as a society to a better place where people are treated as respected human beings. The central core of creativity is nestled in the toddlers. If we desire to make a better society then the toddlers must be studied; we will have to start listening to their ideas, their wants and needs, to learn about their creativity. We must learn to guide these little people in acquiring the simple tools of communication and safety, but we must be ever vigilant that we don’t crush their fragile thinking ability.
The problem
Where do we find the leaders, the facilitators, to nurture these young people? Surely we must start someplace; we can’t work from nothing. Maybe my kind of ignorance is the answer. Possibly a little story that occurred in my early life will help to illuminate a starting place. My friends and I were about seven or eight years old at the time when we visited another boy’s residence during the wintertime. It was cold and snowy and his mother had a nice fire going in the fireplace where she was allowing everyone to roast marshmallows on long sticks. I felt left out because I didn’t like marshmallows. My friend’s mother saw this, and without a word or request from me, gave me a piece of bread with butter. We all ate and had a good time but the warmth that came to me was the kindness of this fine lady. She was concerned for my comfort and acceptance among my friends and, as I have just related, I have never forgotten. She had boosted my self-confidence and demonstrated how to do a good deed. She planted in me a valuable lesson that may have been the start of something decent in me that I could pass on to others. Now, that’s education.