The science of Psychology tries to explain why humans do what they do. In point of fact, the word psychology means: the study of behavior. From the time of Freud to the present, scientists have labored to come up with good explanations to try to understand the human condition and to try to make a roadmap, if you will, so that we can predict exactly what humans will do given any situation. In spite of the wonderful theories and great strides forward, we have in general, failed. Over time the theories have not become more crystallized, but they have become more muddled and blended. Behavioral theory seems to explain much of how humans are controlled by their environment, by reward and punishment, but it is limited to only a small facet of how humans operate. Psychoanalytic theory suggests how the human mentality and emotions are triggered to produce neurosis and psychosis, but “normal behavior” is not elucidated. Rogerian theory points out that the individual acts according to his own cognitions, but that only explains one person’s behavior at a time. In the present, we are seeing more ideas that say that all the older theories apply in some measure; thus a restructuring of the science of human behavior is always at hand. As a result, we really do not have a good explanation. But maybe we are working in a laboratory that is too small.
We Need To Think Bigger
Suppose that we look to that old standby, evolution, for some answers. The science of evolution attempts to explain the progression of a species from its beginnings to its present form. We have learned about the dinosaurs’ humble beginnings and how they evolved into the giants of the Jurassic Period. Then evolution stopped for them and proceeded with the next group of creatures. We know that all creatures came from the sea and then came on dry land and eventually walked upright. Then man came from the apes and started on the evolutionary road to where we are today. Over time the human animal evolved in many ways. The brain, however, appears to not be up to its task. We seek to explain our present environment by looking at our condition juxtaposed our intelligence. We say that we have become smarter because of all our accomplishments in the areas of food production, technology, buildings, communications, and warfare. We even think that we have conquered space. What we really need is to look at ourselves from a greater distance; we are too close to the problem (us) to see what is lacking.
We can’t say that genetics is the larger area of study because we are only now starting to understand a small bit of the genetic component of the human animal. If we suppose that the human has not yet evolved into what he will become, then the whole field of behavior study takes on a different light. It is one thing to say that an animal is evolved to his finished form; he cannot go any further and what you see is what you get. But if an animal is in the process of evolving, then we cannot judge accurately because we cannot know what the finished specie will look like. Take, for example, the common dog. The world over, a dog is a dog. The canine in China acts and reacts the same as a dog in Brazil, the same as a dog in Mexico, and so on. My belief is that the dog has evolved to his maximum; he is complete evolutionarily speaking. As a result, we see much the same behavior no matter where we see the dog. Whenever a male dog sees a fire hydrant, you know what he will do. This concept is true for most species on this planet. Not so with humans. Of course we can draw similar predictions with humans (not the fire hydrant thing) if we observe the lower activities. When any human gets hungry, of course he will head for the refrigerator; if he gets too hot or cold, he will seek shelter; if he is in danger, he will defend himself (sometimes). But, how do we explain the higher functions, those of the largest part of the brain? It has been said that humans do not use the greater portion of the brain; that we do all of our thinking with a tiny portion of the gray matter. No one seems to know why we have such a large brain; it makes no sense to have something that we do not use. It is doubtful that, like the appendix, it is an organ that was used long ago but its usefulness is no longer needed. If anything, the brain is not used enough. (Interestingly, the governments of our societies actively discourage and punish people for trying to think on their own. It seems that governments actively try to prevent evolution; thankfully, that is impossible.)
This writing is proposing that the brain has not evolved enough to become useful. Further, that the brains of some individuals (Einstein, Gandhi, et al.) have shown more development than the average individual. Why is it that there are geniuses? Why isn’t everyone’s brain developed to the point that we know that war, famine, disease, criminality, and other stupidities are contrary to a decent life? The answer cannot be education because having the correct information crammed down the throats of students is casting pearls before swine; the students are not capable of understanding and implementing the information. It makes more sense to say that the brain in most of us is not yet capable of decent living.
Other Organs
Imagine if you will, the heart not having evolved to its present state if efficiency. We would see the human animal dying sooner than he does today; he would not be able to perform the work necessary to build a community; the heart would be a weak point in the anatomy. Taking the amount of heart disease that we see into consideration, we know that the reason for this disease is neglect and stupid decisions, not evolution, for the human heart has evolved to the point where it can sustain us through tremendous abuse. Notice that we cannot take credit for the heart’s efficiency; it has evolved on its own. We did not educate the heart to this level of functioning. We didn’t sit down one day and say, “Hey, let’s make a better heart.” That is way beyond our abilities – at least for the present.
Some Probing Questions
If we can accept the idea that the brain has not yet evolved to where it should be, then we might also ask why this is so. Why has Nature stopped its process? Or, is everything on track and we are just not intelligent enough to see it? Are the geniuses among us just the precursor to what will be? And, what about the lowest intellects among us? The worst examples of evolution like Hitler, Tojo, or any of the terrorists that sully the Earth these days are either throwbacks to when humans might have been nothing more than marauding animals or, like the advanced among us, they represent the bottom end of the continuum from good to evil. It would seem that an evolved mind seeks harmony among its environs in all areas. It would want peace, not war, freedom, not enslavement, enlightenment, not the seven deadly sins.
Why do people kill themselves? Certainly this is not the act of an evolved brain/mind. The intelligent person appreciates the life that has been given to him; he nourishes and protects the gift of life. Why do the sins of man exist? Certainly these are not the product of an evolved brain/mind. It seems that we may be in a stage of transition between a predator existence of long ago, where the human animal thought only of brutality and greed, and the kindness and altruism that one would expect from the evolved brain/mind. Truly we see both in today’s maelstrom that we refer to as “society”. There are myriad examples of greed, stupidity, criminality, injustices, in point of fact, these negative features are on the rise, and they are encouraged and condoned by moronic, bureaucratic leaders at every level of government. We also see wonderful examples of compassion and kindness in individuals. My observations appear to show that the more evolved brains/minds are nestled in single individuals acting toward other individuals; goodness and happiness seem to abound on an individual level. By contrast, the least developed/evolved brains/minds are more concentrated on the government levels where group dynamics (the herd mentality) proliferate. These observations make sense because the more evolved individual does not need interference by probing bureaucrats; they are self governing and they are more apt to enjoy a fruitful, and fulfilling life. The less evolved brains/minds still retain the fearful, ignorant thoughts of the jungle and, the more crowded this planet gets, the more these unintelligent people need to be herded by leaders of their own ilk. In the meantime, it appears that the struggle between evolved and ignorant brains/minds will intensify. Possibly this is the eternal battle between good and evil. As Gandhi pointed out: good always triumphs over evil. Unfortunately, there will be quite a bit of blood unnecessarily spilt.
If these observations and assumptions are accurate, then it is in the interests of human kind that evolution “hurries up” the process before we decimate ourselves. The field of psychology has contented itself with explaining why people are screwed up, but it is my feeling that evolution, when it has completed the human animal, will answer the question: What does the normal human resemble?